Congratulations to more than one thousand physicians across Mass General Brigham, representing diverse specialties and entities, recognized as 2026 Top Doctors.

Routine processes — audits, ads, budgets and ballots — became flashpoints this week as long-standing rules were tested.

In several arenas, the status quo was upended, exposing deeper tensions over authority, accountability and control as disputes spread across branches of government and into the political arena.

That shift was most visible in the latest turn of Auditor Diana DiZoglio's long-running fight over oversight, a conflict that widened sharply beyond the Legislature this week after DiZoglio highlighted that the Trial Court and Appeals Court declined to participate in website accessibility audits sought by her office.

In nearly identical letters, court officials cited a 2023 opinion from Attorney General Andrea Campbell asserting that the auditor's authority is limited to executive branch agencies. As independent branches of government, the courts said, they are not subject to the State Auditor's Office.

For DiZoglio, the refusals marked a dramatic escalation. Already accusing legislative leaders of defying a 2024 voter law authorizing audits of the Legislature, she now says the judiciary is retreating from decades of precedent and using the attorney general's legal interpretation as cover.

The auditor insists her office has audited courts for years, including as recently as 2024, and says the rejected reviews were administrative in nature, not intrusions into judicial decision-making. By invoking Campbell's opinion, DiZoglio argued, the courts have expanded a separation-of-powers dispute into something closer to a "constitutional crisis."

The attorney general's office declined to comment, but the silence did little to cool tensions. What began as a clash between the auditor and lawmakers has now entangled all three branches of state government, with no clear mechanism to resolve the underlying question of who gets audited — and who decides.

Power and its limits also hovered over the campaign trail, where technology is moving faster than election law. Republican gubernatorial candidate Brian Shortsleeve posted an Instagram video featuring an AI-generated imitation of Gov. Maura Healey's voice, framed as a parody of her reelection messaging.

Join us for Keller @ Large LIVE in conversation with House Speaker Ron Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka on Wednesday, February 25, at the MCLE. Register!

The ad, released the same day Healey officially launched her campaign, criticized the governor's record on energy costs, job growth and affordability. Shortsleeve's campaign confirmed it used artificial intelligence to generate the audio, calling the spot satire rather than deception.

The episode punctuated generative technology impacts. State campaign finance law does not explicitly address AI-generated audio or video, and while lawmakers last session approved limited language targeting deceptive election communications within 90 days of an election, enforcement and definitions remain unsettled.

A bill backed by senators in the Joint Committee on Advanced Information Technology, the Internet and Cybersecurity would bar the knowing distribution of materially deceptive election-related media while carving out exemptions for parody and satire.  The Shortsleeve ad may fall into that area — but its appearance this early in the cycle suggests debates over speech, disclosure and AI in elections may be here already.

Healey, for her part, appears less interested in the mechanics of the medium than the message. As she ramps up her reelection bid, the governor has increasingly cast herself as a counterweight to President Trump, whose second-term policies have rippled through immigration, elections and federal-state relations.

Healey and other Democrats continued to frame Massachusetts as a bulwark against what they see as chaos emanating from Washington. Republicans, meanwhile, have pushed back, arguing voters are more focused on household costs, taxes and job creation than national political theater.

Those tensions were on display as federal immigration policy again collided with state priorities. A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's plan to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitian immigrants, just hours before the designation was set to expire.

Healey, Campbell and members of the congressional delegation had warned that terminating TPS would have devastated Massachusetts' health care system, elder care workforce and local economies, particularly in communities with large Haitian populations.

Many Haitian TPS in Massachusetts work as nurses, home health aides and essential service providers. The Trump administration plans to appeal the ruling, but for now, employers were told workers remain eligible to work — a temporary reprieve in a policy environment defined by whiplash.

MASSterList Job Board

President & CEO — NEW!, FamilyAid Boston

Division Chief, Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General

Special Assistant, Office of Congressman Seth Moulton

Select Board Executive Assistant, Town of Southborough

Comptroller, Massachusetts Association of Approved Special Education Schools

Jobs continue below the fold — post a job

Uncertainty also loomed over the state's finances, even as January tax collections delivered optimism. The Department of Revenue reported $4.33 billion in collections, more than $500 million above expectations. The gains were driven by capital gains taxes and revenue from the voter-approved surtax on high-income earners. Withholding taxes, by contrast, were down compared to last year, reinforcing concerns about the labor market.

Budget analysts welcomed the strong showing but cautioned against reading too much into it. Massachusetts is increasingly dependent on volatile revenue streams tied to the stock market, making April tax collections an ever more critical hinge point.

Testifying before a Senate committee this week, fiscal experts said April 2026 revenues are likely to be strong, reflecting last year's market performance. Beyond that, the outlook becomes far less certain as lawmakers begin thinking about fiscal year 2027.

That reliance on capital gains has sharpened anxieties among veteran budget writers, some of whom openly warned that strong short-term numbers could encourage unsustainable spending commitments.

Questions about campaign tactics and transparency surfaced in the ballot arena, where supporters of a proposed rent control initiative defended their claim of running a grassroots signature-gathering campaign.

Organizers under the Keep Massachusetts Home banner did not hire a professional signature-gathering firm, but campaign finance filings showed nearly $690,000 in in-kind contributions from nonprofit organizations, much of it tied to staff time, contractors and organizing expenses.

Opponents argued that signatures collected by paid nonprofit staff are still paid signatures, regardless of who issues the paycheck. Supporters countered that the distinction matters, portraying their effort as community-based organizing rather than transactional petitioning.

The dispute previewed the messaging battles likely ahead if the question reaches the November ballot, with competing definitions of "grassroots" poised to play a central role.

Economic anxiety threaded through transportation policy as well. Business leaders and technology advocates renewed calls for Massachusetts to establish a regulatory framework for autonomous vehicles, pointing to Waymo's announcement that it plans to bring robotaxis to Boston once state law allows.

Mass is losing students, jobs, and families. Here’s the fix.

Supporters framed the issue as a test of competitiveness, warning that Massachusetts risks falling behind dozens of other states that already permit autonomous vehicles. Labor unions pushed back, citing safety concerns and the potential displacement of drivers.

With competing bills stalled in committee, the debate has become a familiar Beacon Hill story: urgency from industry, caution from lawmakers, and no clear timeline for resolution.

Meanwhile, elections continued to reshape the Legislature. Rep. Vanna Howard of Lowell won the Democratic primary for a vacant Middlesex Senate seat, positioning her to become the first Cambodian-American senator in Massachusetts history if she wins the special general election.

Howard faces no Democratic opposition in the March 3 special general election, but the race will include Republican write-in candidate Sam Meas, who said he secured enough votes in the primary to qualify for the ballot. Meas, a Lowell business owner, has previously run unsuccessfully for Congress and the Legislature.

Also on the ballot will be unenrolled candidate Joe Espinola of Dracut, a retired police officer and former school committee member, setting up a three-way contest even as Howard enters the race as the favorite.

If Howard advances as expected, her House seat will open up for competition in the fall, adding another layer of churn to an already busy election year.

Secretary of State William Galvin also made news, announcing he will seek a record ninth term in office. Galvin cited concerns about federal interference in elections, voting rights and the 2030 census, signaling that election administration — once a largely technocratic domain — is firmly embedded in the political battlefield.

Even infrastructure reflected the week's theme of fragility. The MBTA's new commuter rail fare gates at South Station were returned to service after being knocked offline by a winter storm, with officials acknowledging the challenges of operating exposed equipment in harsh conditions.

The gates, installed at a cost of about $3.3 million, will face another test this weekend as bitter cold and snow return, underscoring how even long-planned modernization efforts remain vulnerable to reality.

THE SUNDAY SHOWS

NOTE: WCVB’s “On the Record” and NBC Boston’s “@ Issue” shows are taking a break during the Super Bowl and the Olympics, which are broadcast on NBC.

JOB BOARD

Do you have an open job you'd like to feature here? Click here to place a job board order, or email Dylan Rossiter at [email protected].

Executive Director, Center for Health Information and Analysis, Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General

Controller, Commonwealth Corporation

Senior Investigator, ISAU, Massachusetts Office of the Inspector General

Controller, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

Director of Preliminary Investigations, Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

Chief Planner, City of Newton

Director of Policy and Program Operations, Massachusetts Association for Mental Health

ICYMI